February 2018 update

Posted by on Feb 7, 2019 in News and Events | 0 comments

Well, I was wrong at the start of the season. We’re not up by February, but we’re 2nd on goal difference and that is better than most people thought we would be. We’ve had a ridiculously bad season for injuries again, Bielsa’s rigorous whip cracking, slave-driving regime, notwithstanding, I blame the pitch and the training facilities (hahahaha – joke honestly). Apologies for no January update, we had the branch meeting late because of QPR in the Cup and then January descended into the usual nightmare of paperwork, IT problems and number crunching as it does. Not to mention the small piece of work that was the charter…. February update cumulative then.

Monthly Branch Meeting

Thanks to everyone who showed up even though there wasn’t any free alcohol this month (January was free drink on the branch month). The majority of the meeting was spent discussing away tickets, the LUSC exec meeting about away tickets and the Charter, and then the Charter. There was an overwhelming majority in favour of option one (publish and be damned) and the branch recorded the vote by the Monday deadline date set. There is very little else to be said about the matter, all we can do is wait and see what happens next season should we get promoted. The branch as always will endeavour to order tickets for the branch members who cannot order them on their own due to work commitments or just general incompetence with technology. I would like to take this opportunity to point out that the myth that we order vast, industrial numbers of tickets to pass on to all and sundry is perpetuated by complete utter total wasters who know f*** all. It is hard enough to get tickets for those who haven’t missed a game for years, and we didn’t get any for Stoke, so please desist. On a lighter note, the Hospitality Raffle prize of two tickets for the Millwall game has commenced. See below in AOB.

Memberships

The Membership Secretary had his evening of drinking ruined by The Chairman, Deputy Yates, Dave Poole and Dave Rowson the other Sunday. The photo attached shows him fully conversant and acknowledging the fact that The Membership Secretary position is for life, not just Christmas. We are still receiving requests to join the branch, but given there are only 3 months left of the season, it seems a bit harsh to charge anyone the £7, so these new memberships forms (as opposed to renewals) will be deferred to next season. In the event of a play off final at Wembley (and if we get any tickets of course) , travel will be run strictly for branch members only, NO EXCEPTIONS. Just a pleasant reminder that EVERYONE needs to fill in a renewal form, EVERY year. Just passing the money onto The Secretary does not guarantee that the form will be filled in, and the Membership Secretary does like to see all those forms. That’s the thing he looks forward to every year, just getting a proper stamped, addressed envelope makes his day.

Away games

Bus times for Boro are available on facebook. Expressions of interest for QPR on Tuesday 26th February will now be accepted. Unfortunately due to the away ticketing situation, it has been very difficult of late, I’m bored with it all now. No further comment. Actually I’m not bored at all, I’m still really hacked off with it. But trying to have proper debate with people who have just decided to start following Leeds again after they cleared off when we dropped to Division 3 (or even earlier) gets tiresome and boring after a while.

A.O.B

The away ticket Charter – what can I say?

Tickets for the Hospitality in the East Stand for the game against Millwall Saturday March 30th were picked up by Dave Poole last Thursday. We have ordered some more and these will hopefully have arrived in time for the Boro game on Saturday. Anyone wishing to enter can contact The Secretary, usual channels, remember STRICTLY LUSC MEMBERS ONLY. £1 per ticket.

Fake news that Ken hasn’t filled in a membership form this season has been quashed by The Secretary. Said form was completed in August and membership card was issued. The Membership Secretary may have been a little flummoxed by Dave thrusting a candle into his face in a Kim Basinger 9 and a half weeks type manner.

Harrogatewhites website is still doing OK. The googleanalytics have been received from Paul Yates and there were 2,058 new users according to the info from Feb 2018 to Feb 2019. So that means about 170+ new people per month. Considering the content is patchy at best, dependent on how busy / annoyed / tired / hungover the MPO is, the figures are pretty darned good. Unfortunately this also means the MPO needs to carry on with it. If anyone wishes to contribute anything, please get in touch via The Secretary.

 

 

 

Read More

The Rise and Fall of The Passive Aggressive

Posted by on Feb 2, 2019 in Blog | 0 comments

The first time I heard the phrase “passive aggressive” was in The Smurfs film in 2011. Passive Aggressive Smurf, however, did not actually surface until the sequel in 2013. He was described by Smurfette as a nice Smurf but he always leaves you feeling bad when finish talking to him.

For the benefit of those of you who have not seen The Smurfs Movie, and those who don’t understand what “passive aggressiveness” is, I will try to explain this relatively new phenomenon, and what it’s relevance is.

Passive Aggressive (according to the Oxford Dictionary https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/passive-aggressive )

ADJECTIVE

  • Of or denoting a type of behaviour or personality characterized by indirect resistance to the demands of others and an avoidance of direct confrontation.

Ok. So what does that mean? And why am I so bothered about it?

Initially, I was going to call this article “Rise Of The Superfan” like Rise Of the Foot Soldier, as it too started with football (as opposed to the crime, violence, murderous intent and drug trafficking which it finished with – watch the first film, the other two weren’t so good). Once I started writing however, I realised that what I am describing is simply a sad indictment of the times that we are living in. A incogniscent society where people happily hide behind their little safety shield of the hashtag, not revealing their real identity and not accepting any personal responsibility for their 140 characters of  indirect confrontational attention seeking.

It has become the socially acceptable norm now, for people behind their hashtag safety curtain to spout self righteous drivel in order to set their own little power dynamic going. I wish I could just blame it on the snowflake millenial generation, but even the older ones are doing it now. Some of these are well educated individuals, with sensible and responsible jobs or positions and families who would be shocked at their language. But once that little blue bird takes over, all the common sense flies out of the window.

Once those little piggies start tippy tappying, the whole of the universe gets put aside in the tirade of self absorbed blustering conflabulation. After all everyone is entitled to my opinion.

So what has this got to do with football, I hear you say?

I was sent a Twitter screenshot of someone calling someone else a “Superfan”. But Superfan wasn’t meant in the nice normal way, like in Superman or Super sized or Super Duper. When I think of Super, I think of something as being first class, outstanding, excellent, marvellous, magnificent etc. But the context that this word “Superfan” was being used was actually in a derogatory manner. It actually read that being a “Superfan” meant that you were in some way glorifying or basking in the limelight of being haughtily more superior than any other fan. The context in which it was used implied that a “Superfan” was actually something not very good at all.

The context was, believe it or not, getting away tickets… yes that old chestnut.

The less than 140 character whinge was basically stating anyone should be allowed to get an away ticket, regardless of the length of time that they had been “supporting” Leeds United. Contentious issue – yes. The discussion about how “loyal” someone is rarely makes any sense. Especially when the conversation is between people who have spent most of their entire lives/money/time traipsing up and down the country versus people who have only decided to come to a game since we have started to play well.

Truth hurts doesn’t it?

In the true spirit of this piece on passive aggressiveness, I should be saying “Sorry – not sorry” (I think).

This is passive aggressiveness. Where the way that some speaks to you, or indeed writes, although in the literal sense is ok, actually is quite the opposite and it leaves you with the impossible task of working out what the appropriate response should be. It’s all a bit uncomfortable. The tone is purposefully confrontational. It’s deliberately done to demand a response, but because it is indirect, how do you respond?

My initial response was F*** Off, you thick as s**t bandwagon jumper, but I calmed down quickly as I know that once I resort to name calling, the argument is lost.

I realised that this wasn’t the first time I had heard the phrase “Superfan”.

We all know about “celebrity” Leeds fans. That bloke from James, the one from Stereophonics, the one from the Office, Father Dougal, Colin Montgomerie and most of the Swedish tennis players in the 90s. We also know of Leeds fans who have written books, risked being interviewed on the telly or on the radio (without fearing that their words are twisted or edited to achieve the broadcasters aims) and the other familiar faces who turn up, week in, week out to games or those who come over from Ireland and Scandinavia etc. when they can and everyone turns out to say hello. Basically, just your normal fans then.

And then there are those who are on social media 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, constantly seeking reassurance, by telling other people that they “really are fans”, that they are fans. Strangely enough, these people never existed in the 90’s and 2000’s, did they? Even in the heady days of The Champions League when we sold out to crowds of 38,000 plus, I can’t remember hearing a peep out of them. Where have they been in the last 10 years? Bizarre, isn’t it? Even with the old “Bates Out/Cellino Out/Orta Out” movements over the last 5 years or so, there has been little sight or sound of these “fans”. These, dear Readers, I have decided, in my opinion, are the ones who have elevated themselves to the giddy heights of Superfandom.

The fact is that the people who have dedicated their lives to following Leeds United are NOT “Superfans”. We are just normal fans. Normal fans who travel home and away to watch Leeds. In the case of those fans who can’t get to games, the ones who have a “no go” zone around them and the telly/computer/laptop/radio (delete as appropriate) from kick off until the final whistle blows.

There is nothing “super” about these people. This is what football fans do and have always done since the beautiful game came about.

To spell it out: Fans – short for fanatics.

Fanatic (according to the Oxford Dictionary https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/fanatic)

fanatic

NOUN

  • A person filled with excessive and single-minded zeal, especially for an extreme religious or political cause.

    ‘religious fanatics’
    1. 1.1 informal A person with an obsessive interest in and enthusiasm for a particular activity.
      ‘a fitness fanatic’

Most Leeds United fans can be described as being filled with excessive single-mindedness about watching the team, and do have an obsessive interest or enthusiasm. Most of us would give an arm and a leg to go watch the team, supporting them, getting behind the team and the coach 100%, never booing them off the pitch, staying to the final whistle, whatever the day of the week, whatever the time of the day, 1st team, reserves and the youth team.

Here is the polarizing comment, drum roll please…… not all Leeds United fans are as fanatical as the next.

Not all Leeds United fans can turn up anytime, any place, anywhere (like a Martini…look it up younger readers). Not all Leeds United fans actually go and watch the team at Elland Road, let alone away (especially not these last few games). Not all Leeds United fans would sacrifice their jobs, money, family time and health to follow Leeds. Some have higher priorities, like putting food on the table or keeping a roof over their heads. I completely commend them and I cannot, and will not, pass judgement on these people.

I do know people that can, and do, however. I do know people that have completely dedicated their lives to Leeds United, with single-minded zeal, obsessive interest and enthusiasm over the last half a century. The same faces who I see at most games, bringing their kids and their grandkids, their nephews and nieces and other halves over the years. The same ones who bring along friends, and friends’ friends and their families spreading the Leeds United gospel. The same ones who when they disappear abroad, still try to come back to the odd game or two. The same ones who aren’t from these shores, but love Leeds United so much they come to every game they can.

I am pretty sure fans followed Leeds United relentlessly around the country (and the world) through the 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s and 2000s but thanks to the absence of social media, only their friends and fellow supporters knew about it. Following Leeds United is not a new thing. It is and was the DONE thing, and no one ever needed to make a song and dance about it, until now of course. This is what it was like that before the advent of social media and how it will be once the likes of Twitter etc. have left this mortal coil. Being a Leeds United fan is NOT a new thing.

Publicly declaring how much of a Leeds United fan you are, well that is a new thing.

Not considering other fans feelings when you are publicly declaring how much of a fan you are, that is a new thing.

Telling people that they don’t deserve to continue to watch the Club they love and have devoted their lives to for the last 40 years, that is a new thing.

Telling people that just because they have given up most of their life following Leeds United, it doesn’t make them any better than you, that is a new thing.

Telling people that you deserve a ticket over the people who have spent years slowly, painfully and patiently building up their loyalty by going to the crap midweek long away games in the middle of winter, when no one else will go, that is a new thing. Yes – that is how everyone starts!

Assuming that the number of “likes” and “smiley faces” you receive when you are typing your nonsense makes you a better person, that is a new thing.

Checking on your device every 2 minutes, desperate for your dose of positive reinforcement “smiley face” or “thumbs up” gratification, that is a new thing.

Thinking you have the right to be abusive and resorting to name calling to get your own way, like a spoilt child, that is a new thing.

Thinking that you have the right to dismiss others because you shout the loudest (or TYPE IN CAPITALS), that is a new thing. (ok – not new, everyone hates a gobs**te)

Here endeth the passive aggressiveness.

As it says in The Disclaimer, you are free to stop reading this at any time (especially if you feel hurt by my words). No one is making you do anything right now. You can fume all you like and then block me or my posts. I really don’t care.

What I care about is the sad truth that I (and many of my friends) am being stopped from doing what I have done for more than half my lifetime, by people who basically have come along for the ride. Todays highlight at Elland Road, “You’re in my seat mate” , “No, these are our seats” , “I’m not asking you, I’m telling you – that’s my season ticket seat”. Says it all doesn’t it?

I know there are some moderates in the Twitteratti and Noseybook Land, but there are also some right idiots, this is aimed at them.

I was following Leeds United when we were crap in the 80s, when we got better in the 90s, when we over achieved in the 2000s and then fell flat on our arses halfway through. I was there in the dark days of Division 3 football and I am here now. I will be still here next season, and the season after and long after the rest of you part timers have cleared off, chasing down your next glory seeking project.

The time for mincing words has long passed.

I will Always be Leeds, I will Always be Loyal.

Where were you when we were crap? Not just in the last ten years either, where were you at Preston, Villa, Cardiff and Hull last season?

I can tell you where you weren’t.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Read More

Rotherham Ruminations

Posted by on Jan 28, 2019 in Chairman Charley | 0 comments

This weeks topical discussions include a mixture of O Level geometry and English, as well as the on going discussion of who The Chairman’s favourite cartoon characters were when he was growing up. Of course this implies that The Chairman has actually grown up…. Invited into the fray was the resident branch novelist, celebrated author Sonia, Ken, the man who’s aim it is to be in The Chairman’s inner circle and Steve The Pedant, who’s nemesis is citrus flavoured chocolate products.

Mathematical principles.

Q: So why is it that it is called an inner circle?

A: Eh?

Q: Why does it have to be an inner circle? What’s wrong with an inner square or a triangle? Even a rectangle?

A: Probably because inner rhombus just doesn’t have the same ring to it. Ring?? (drum roll and cymbal)

Q: But who decided it had to be a circle? What’s the point of a circle?

A: A circle doesn’t have a point, Charley, that’s why it’s called a circle. If it had a point it would be a pyramid.

Sonia: I knew a girl who went across a circle, she was called Di – Diameter

Ken: I knew a guy who just went halfway across, he’s called Ray – Ray Dius

A: I knew a Lord who went all the way round – they called him Sir , Sir Cumference.

The Chairman’s Inner Circle

Ken: So what do I need to do to get into your Inner Circle Charley?

A: My inner circle is closed now, there is only 4 people allowed.

Sonia: So there’s only 4 sides, so shouldn’t that be an inner square then?

CC: No, only four people, it is closed.

Ken: What if one of them leaves? How does another one get in if it is closed?

Sonia: Yes, what about the other 2996?

CC: No , these are my inner circle, not my followers, I have 3000 followers.

Sonia: So these 4 aren’t even your followers?

CC: No these are my inner circle.

Q: So none of your followers can be in your inner circle, then? What’s the point of that?

CC: It’s a circle, there is no point.

Cartoon Capers & Caricatures

CC: Which cartoon character would you go out with?

A: Eh?

CC: If you could go out with a cartoon character, who would it be?

A: It’s not something I have really put a lot of thought into actually. Why on earth would you think of something like that?

CC: No, just, without thinking, who would you go out with from a cartoon? What about Penelope Pitstop?

A: You’d have to deal with Peter Perfect and The Ant Hill Mob, so you wouldn’t get a look in there.

Steve: Jessica Rabbit

CC: No, she’s real, she’s not a proper cartoon character.

Steve: She’s not real, Charley.

CC: I thought about Wilma from the Flintstones, but she just shouts too much. You’d never get a moments peace.

Dave: What about Betty?

CC: Oh yes, Betty. No wonder Barney married her.

Citrus based chocolate products

(Victory Jaffa cakes were offered round after the game)

Steve: No thanks, I can’t stand them.

A: Eh?

Steve: I just don’t like them.

Q: But you eat oranges?

Steve: Yep

Q: You like chocolate?

Steve: Yep

Q: What about Terry’s chocolate orange? Tap It, Unwrap It?

Steve: Ugh

Q: Quality Street Orange Creme?

Steve: Even worse

Q: What’s up with you man?

Steve: I like both in isolation, just when the two are put together, can’t cope. And it’s not just oranges, it’s any citrus product in combination with chocolate

CC: Is that your Kryptonite then?

Steve: I suppose so

CC: Do you lose all your super powers in the presence of a Jaffa Cake?

Steve: I didn’t know I had any. If I had, I could break into your inner circle.

CC: Not if there were any Jaffa cakes nearby you wouldn’t.

thanks to googleimages for the picture of The Pedant’s kryptonite

 

 

 

 

Read More

Stoke Shenanigans

Posted by on Jan 23, 2019 in Chairman Charley | 0 comments

There was much discussed on the way to Stoke, fortunately, I am not going to go through all of the stories though, as the tone was significantly lowered a few times too many.

Songs To Watch The World Go By

CC: This must be one of the best songs about Brexit and the EU.

A: Eh?

CC: Hotel California

A: Eh?

CC: Well, just listen to it.  It’s just the same as what’s going on now. You can check out anytime you like, but you can never leave.

A: Point taken

Food For Thought

CC: 10cc did my favourite song

Q: what’s that then Charley?

CC: You’re not in love. Great song

A: Not as good as Hotel California

CC: 10cc, what a brilliant name for a band. Do you know why they were called 10cc?

A: No, not really, kinda unusual.

CC: Well, it’s because it’s supposed to have something to do with the amount of “fluid” that comes out when you have sex.

A: Eh?

CC: You know when a man (the rest of this conversation has been redacted as too delicate for you, dear readers)

MPO: Brilliant. I am trying to eat my ham sandwich….. Cheers

CC: Did you have any mayo on that?

Lessons In Love

CC: All I had to do was post “The Perfect Year” by Dina Carroll, and it all fell into place

A: Eh?

CC: The Perfect Year – “I don’t need a crowded ballroom, everything I need is here”

A: Eh?

CC: “If you’re with me, next year will be, the perfect year”

A: Eh?

CC: It’s a classic, you don’t even need to say anything else. The song says it all

A: Is this the sure fire way to pick up women, Charley?

CC: Works for me, every time.

Charley’s Angels

Q: So who would be your favourite Angel then Charley?

A: Farah Fawcett Major. Has to be

Q: Wasn’t she replaced though?

A: Farah Fawcett, the other two weren’t anywhere near, couldn’t touch her.

Dave: I thought the one with the black hair was alright.

Steve: Kate Jackson, yeah she was ok

CC: No, Jaclyn Smith – she had the black hair

Dave: No Kate Jackson

CC: No, everyone’s favourite was Farah Fawcett Major

Steve: Isn’t she dead now?

Dave: Is she dead? How would you know if she is dead?

CC: Well she wouldn’t be moving would she? Go up to her and prod her.

MPO: Just Google it

CC: No honestly, you don’t need to google it. If she doesn’t move, it means she’s dead.

 

thanks to google images for the picture of Charlie’s Angels

Read More

Pot, Kettle, Black – The Last Word

Posted by on Jan 13, 2019 in Blog | 0 comments

Here’s to hoping that this will be the last word on this subject, but obviously the Leeds United hate mob on BBC Look North have yet to summarise on the Monday evening football round up, so we will just have to wait and see 6.30pm tomorrow night.

After this morning’s rather refreshing snippet on SkyTVisf**kings**t’s Sunday Supplement, I live in hope that the hysteria on Friday and Saturday will have finally died down. When the dust settles and SkyTVisf**kings**t’s carefully orchestrated pre-match build up is finally revealed as the cheap attempt to get viewing figures up, that it was, the truth will out.

It is a sad state of affairs when something like this is used as a soundbyte and manipulated so badly that even the washed up hasbeens that they dragged out to tow the party line are sweating so much, it looked like they’d had twelve rounds with Josh. No amount of make up is ever going to get that shine off your forehead, Keith.

Apparently even the Rozzers had put out a tweet that showed someone sat in the back of a police van. What happened to innocent until proven guilty? What happened to right to privacy? What happened to confidentiality? On an even more serious note, what crimes were not being dealt with, whilst the Derby constabulary were sent to the training ground on an errand of “something really important?”

The sad fact is that as soon as the news broke, SkyTVisf**kings**t and the (tax payer funded) BBC just could not help themselves. There was no way they would not jump on this opportunity to bump up the ratings. You can see the “kerching” dollar signs and Pulitzer prize eye balls flicking furiously along with the slobbering jowls of sports editors. Not until the hysteria had dampened, after they had speed-dialled every single old player/manager at whistle stop speed to get their “reactions”, did someone realise that they should really have checked their information.

By then it was too late, the damage had been done and all they could do was hope that no one would bring up Fergie sending drones to the Blue side of the city in 2009 and that they was no evidence of what Mourinho got Villa Boas to do (whilst Lampard was at Chelski). The beauty of social media though is that nothing ever gets deleted for good and sure enough, the pictures of articles and tweets etc. were swiftly put up on Facebook, twitter etc. to remind folk that the truth is out there.

To save face, none of this was mentioned in dispatches, as of course, no one likes to be told that they are wrong. So the perpetuation continued until Charlie Nicholas, on the programme which was directly after the Leeds v Derby game, unbelievably (Jeff), said it was going on in his day. Ouch!

As I see it, the only good thing to come out of this will be that in the run up to the January transfer window, SkyTVisf**kings**t will have to choose their words very wisely. The norm is that they have reporters, standing outside training grounds, trying to look into cars and over walls etc in the last week of January, waiting for “the sensational latest news”. All you hear is the phrase “reports from Sky Sports sources is…” or “we have inside information from sources at the Clubs…” . It is on 24 hours a day, 7 days a weeks if you have the Sky Sports 409 news channel on in the background through January. You also get it on Sky news on their sports updates.

Who are these “sources”? Is this not just the same as some bloke looking over a wall at Derby?

 

credits to John Takai at Dreamstime.com for the photo via googleimages

Read More